The Emperor's New Clothes

Article from MBA NewsLink on Refi’s
October 3, 2012, 9:11 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

Refi Applications Hit 3-Year High as Rates Fall to Record Lows
Sorohan, Mike
Mortgage rates hit record lows for the third consecutive week, triggering the highest level of refinance applications since 2009, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported this morning in its Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending September 28.

The overall Market Composite Index increased by 16.6 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased by 17 percent compared to the previous week. 

The Refinance Index increased by 20 percent from the previous week, reaching its highest level since April 2009. The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 83 percent of total applications from 81 percent the previous week. The Home Affordable Refinance Program share of refinance applications decreased to 23 percent last week from 26 percent the prior week.

The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased by 4 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index also increased by 4 percent compared to the previous week and was 11 percent higher than the same week one year ago.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,500 or less) decreased to 3.53 percent from 3.63 percent, the lowest rate in the history of the survey, with points decreasing to 0.35 from 0.41 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with jumbo loan balances (greater than $417,500) decreased to 3.82 percent from 3.87 percent, also a survey record low, with points decreasing to 0.32 from 0.33 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages backed by the FHA decreased to 3.37 percent from 3.44 percent, a record low, with points decreasing to 0.36 from 0.41 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The average contract interest rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 2.90 percent from 2.98 percent, with points decreasing to 0.27 from 0.41 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The average contract interest rate for 5/1 adjustable-rate mortgages decreased to 2.59 percent from 2.61 percent, with points decreasing to 0.34 from 0.41 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The ARM share of activity remained at 4 percent of total applications.

The survey covers more than 75 percent of all U.S. retail and consumer direct residential mortgage applications and has been conducted weekly since 1990. Respondents include mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts.

August Fannie Mae Prepay Speeds

Annualized one-month prepay speeds on Fannie Mae MBSs seem to support the prepay models high expectations.  The data below is based on the underlying mortgage coupon, not the pass-thru rate.  I also, excluded those tranches that had statistically insignificant volume. 

As you can see, everything above 4.5% is getting hit pretty hard.  The seasoned pools are not quite as bad as the moderately seasoned.  ARM pools (not shown) prepayed at an annualized rate (CPR) of 25%

There is a wide divergence of speeds by state.  The “bubble” states (AZ, CA, FL & NV), interestingly, were all among the highest prepay states.  Puerto Rico was the slowest.

We will be updating this monthly and, hopefully, start to be able to draw conclusions as we gather more data,

8/15/2012 SIFMA Prepay Speeds

Speeds for the 15th have been posted on our site. They appear to have diminished substantially from their 7/31 highs,

MSR 2nd Quarter 2012 10Q values
August 14, 2012, 6:33 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

After a one quarter respite, MSR values seem to be on the decline once again.  It appears that quantitative easing, Basel III, and HARP2 are weighing heavily on servicing values.

HARP Refinances Continue Surge
July 16, 2012, 10:58 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

This may be good for the mortgagors, but increasing refi activity is not good for servicers.

FHFA News Release 2012_0716

Refi’s Wreak Havoc on MSR Impairment
July 10, 2012, 3:21 pm
Filed under: Lessons Learned, Mortgage Servicing Rights, MSRs, Prepay Speeds

This has been a difficult year for servicers.  In addition to increasing costs and ever more regulatory burdens, we continue to see most of our new servicing coming from refinancings.  For the majority of servicers that do not utilize fair-value accounting, this can result in bloated temporary impairment reserves. This temporary impairment is really permanent, and should be written down as the loans pay-off.

From an economic perspective, refi’s are not beneficial to the servicing industry.  While the new loan added may be slightly more valuable than the pay-off due to higher balance, lower coupon and extended maturity, the increased value is oftentimes offset by the cost of paying off the old loan and setting up the new. 

Yet from an accounting perspective, many servicers add the value of the newly originated MSR to their capitalized servicing and continue to amortize the capitalized servicing on the old loan.  The theory behind this is that the amortization already reflects the expectation of premature pay-offs and thus, to write-off the loan, is redundant.  This, however, creates the opportunity for impairment when refi’s make up the preponderance of new originations.

To illustrate this, I took a hypothetical portfolio of 2,500 loans ($550MM) and valued it over six periods.  Each period has the identical prepay and other assumptions as the last.  Accordingly, the overall value hovered around 1.0% (5.5MM).  However, in each period I assumed that 100 loans refinanced.  The new loans have the identical characteristics as the old loan except for the origination and maturity dates.  Accordingly, the current principal balance of the servicing portfolio does not change over the time period reviewed.  The value remains relatively constant over time,  diminishing only slightly as the portfolio ages.  Basis equal to the fair market value of the new loans was added in every period, and amortization was calculated based on the portfolio’s decreasing economic life. 

The analysis was run twice: first with no write-off of the basis (“amortization only”) on the paid-in-fulls.  Amortization is thus relied on to keep the basis in line with market value; and second, with a “write-off” of the paid-in-fulls’ bases as the loans are refinanced.  The differing results are dramatic.

Amortization Only – The red line on the graph below shows the rapid escalation of basis as new loans, and their respective bases, are added.  This is, admittedly, an extreme scenario.  I have assumed a high volume of pay-offs, all of them are refinances, and 100% of the refis are recaptured by our hypothetical mortgage servicer.   It is clear why the impairment is growing so rapidly in this scenario.  The growth in basis is substantial and, while amortization is growing as well, the net of the two fails to adequately reflect the fact that the market value of the portfolio is essentially unchanged over this time period.  Since market value of the overall portfolio is essentially static, impairment grows exponentially. 

Write-off – Comparing that however, to a Write-off scenario, where the basis on paid-in-fulls are written down, the dynamics change dramatically.  The green line in the same graph shows the basis as adjusted for the write-off of the old refi’d loan.  As is evident, there is no impairment under this scenario.  The “write-offs” are simply recognizing as a permanent impairment that which would be considered temporary under the Amortization Only method.  Since the resultant basis is lower, this approach has the additional benefit of reducing amortization going forward.  Over time, there is no difference in the two methodologies.  100% of the basis will be written off eventually, it is just a matter of when and how. 

Writing-off the basis on loans that have refinanced may not be popular with the folks in originations.  After a particularly good month of originations, no one wants to hear that the net effect on the bottom line approaches zero.  However, we are deluding ourselves, in a high refinance environment, in thinking we are making progress.  The refinance business, from a servicer’s perspective is at best a zero sum game.

The mortgage industry’s growth has historically been driven by population growth and real estate appreciation.  In this growth scenario it may be defensible to add the basis on the purchase money loans added and rely on amortization to reflect pay-offs.  Neither is the case today.  Absent immigration, our population is expected to be stagnant through 2050, and real estate values continue their inexorable decline towards more sustainable levels.  Our total industry servicing rights accordingly, are not growing.  We are simply moving them around from one company to another.  In this environment, it is prudent to write-off loans that that have refi’d.

 As published in Mortgage Banking Magazine, May, 2012

3/31/2012 Bank Delinquencies
May 29, 2012, 9:29 am
Filed under: Credit, Mortgage Servicing Rights

March 31, 2012 mortgage delinquencies are showing mixed results.  Based on March, 2012 Call Reports, total delinquencies for all bank-owned residential mortgages (totalling $3.7T) increased slightly while multi-families and commercials continued to drop (see below).

It is interesting to note, however, that if you segregate HELOCs and 2nds from the residential numbers, the resi-1sts actually declined while the 2nds showed some material deterioration.

2nds have heretofore have been relatively impervious to the real estate downturn. Possibly, this was due to tougher underwriting guidelines for these products.  Studies show, however, that even high FICO borrowers have their limits and that when adjusted LTVs rise above 115%, they tend to mail in the keys.  These borrowers may be finally hitting the wall on making their payments on underwater mortgages .  This needs watching.